Home/ Practice Areas/ Civil Litigation/ Fraud & Misrepresentation
Fraud & Misrepresentation

Miami Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney

Civil fraud claims across Miami-Dade and South Florida turn on documentation, timing, and proving each element under Florida law. Reliance, materiality, and damages all have to be supported by the record.

i
Florida fraud claims have a 4-year limitations period from discovery. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). The clock runs from when the fraud was discovered or should have been discovered with due diligence. Early counsel involvement preserves both the record and the deadline.
★★★★★4.8 / 5.0
100+ Verified Client Reviews
Featured on Google · Avvo · LinkedIn
35+
Years of Practice
Florida Bar member since 1989
1989
Florida Bar Licensed
University of Miami School of Law
State & Federal
Court Admission
SDFL (1991), MDFL (2001)
Boutique
Practice Model
Direct attorney involvement
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to file a fraud claim in Florida?+
Florida fraud claims must be filed within 4 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). The 4-year clock runs from when the fraud was discovered or should have been discovered with due diligence. An outer statute of repose under Fla. Stat. § 95.031(2)(a) caps the discovery rule at 12 years from the alleged fraudulent act. See our full Florida Statute of Limitations reference guide for the complete breakdown by case type.
What is the difference between fraud and misrepresentation?+
Fraud generally requires intentional or reckless conduct: knowledge of falsity and intent to induce reliance. Misrepresentation is a broader term that includes negligent misrepresentation, where a false statement was made without reasonable care for its truth but without the intent required for fraud. The two have different mental-state requirements and different available damages.
What is fraudulent inducement?+
Fraudulent inducement is a claim that one party was misled into entering a contract, transaction, or business relationship based on a false representation. It is a recognized cause of action under Florida law and can support both money damages and rescission of the underlying agreement. The elements are the same as common-law fraud, applied to inducement of the contract. See our full Legal Terms Glossary for more Florida-specific definitions.
Can silence be fraud?+
Sometimes. Florida recognizes fraud by concealment or nondisclosure when there is a duty to disclose. Duty arises from a confidential or fiduciary relationship, partial disclosure that creates a misleading impression, or specific statutory disclosure obligations. Without a duty to disclose, silence generally is not fraud.
What does justifiable reliance mean?+
Justifiable reliance means the recipient relied on the false statement, and the reliance was reasonable under the circumstances. Florida courts examine whether obvious red flags existed, whether the recipient had access to the truth, and whether reasonable diligence would have revealed the falsity. Reliance is often the most contested element in civil fraud cases.
Can I get punitive damages for fraud?+
Yes, in appropriate cases. Florida allows punitive damages in civil fraud cases under Fla. Stat. § 768.72 when intentional misconduct or gross negligence is shown by clear and convincing evidence. Punitive damages require leave of court before they can be pleaded, and Florida caps punitive damages under Fla. Stat. § 768.73 absent specific findings.
What is rescission?+
Rescission is an equitable remedy where the court unwinds a contract or transaction induced by fraud, returning the parties to their pre-transaction position. It is available where money damages are inadequate. Rescission requires the rescinding party to return what was received and is subject to equitable defenses including delay (laches) and ratification.
How is fraud pleaded in Florida court?+
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.120(b) requires fraud to be pleaded with particularity. The complaint must state the specific false statement, who made it, when and where it was made, why it was false, and how the plaintiff was damaged. Generic fraud allegations are vulnerable to motions to dismiss for failure to plead with the required specificity.
Does the firm handle both plaintiff and defense fraud cases?+
Yes. The firm represents both parties pursuing fraud claims and parties defending against them. Each side requires different strategy, but the underlying preparation, document review, and disciplined approach to the case is the same.
Do you handle fraud cases outside Miami?+
Yes. The firm handles civil fraud and misrepresentation cases across South Florida.
Three Categories of Misrepresentation

Forms of Civil Fraud Under Florida Law

Florida civil fraud claims fall into three main categories, each with its own elements and burden of proof. The category controls what facts have to be shown, what defenses apply, and what damages are available. The right framework is identified during initial case review.

FORM 01

Affirmative Misrepresentation

A false statement of material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, intent that the other party rely on it, justifiable reliance, and resulting damages. The classic civil fraud claim under Florida common law.

FORM 02

Concealment & Nondisclosure

Liability for failing to disclose a material fact when there is a duty to disclose. Duty arises from a confidential relationship, partial disclosure that creates a misleading impression, or specific statutory disclosure obligations.

FORM 03

Negligent Misrepresentation

A false statement made without reasonable care for its truth, on which the other party justifiably relied. Lower mental-state standard than affirmative fraud, but still requires proof of duty, breach, reliance, and damages.

Critical Filing Deadlines

Limitations Periods That Define These Cases

Florida fraud claims are governed by strict limitations periods. The discovery rule applies for fraud, but only within an outer statute of repose. Missed deadlines can permanently bar the claim regardless of merits.

4
Years / Discovery

Fraud Limitations Period

Florida fraud claims must be filed within 4 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). The clock runs from when the fraud was discovered or should have been discovered with due diligence.

12
Years / Repose

Statute of Repose

Florida's outer statute of repose for fraud claims is 12 years from the alleged fraudulent act under Fla. Stat. § 95.031(2)(a). This caps the discovery rule's reach regardless of when the fraud was discovered.

5
Years / Contract

Related Contract Claims

Fraud claims often run alongside breach of contract claims. Written contract claims have a 5-year limitations period under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). The interplay matters when fraud claims may be time-barred but contract claims remain viable.

Elements and Available Remedies

Proving Fraud and Recovering Damages

Florida civil fraud requires proof of specific elements. Available remedies depend on the type of fraud, the harm proven, and the circumstances of the case.

Element / Remedy
Type
Standard / Description
False Statement of Material FactElement 1
Required
Must be statement of present or past fact, not opinion or future promise. Materiality means a reasonable person would consider it important to the decision.
Knowledge of Falsity (Scienter)Element 2
Required
Speaker knew the statement was false, made it without belief in its truth, or made it recklessly without regard for truth or falsity.
Intent to Induce RelianceElement 3
Required
Statement was made with intent that the other party rely on it. Intent can be inferred from the circumstances of the communication.
Justifiable RelianceElement 4
Required
The recipient relied on the statement, and the reliance was justifiable under the circumstances. Reasonable diligence may be required where red flags existed.
Resulting DamagesElement 5
Required
Reliance caused actual harm. Damages must be proven with reasonable certainty and tied causally to the misrepresentation.
Compensatory DamagesAvailable Remedy
Money
Out-of-pocket loss caused by reliance, plus benefit-of-the-bargain damages where appropriate. Most common fraud remedy.
Punitive DamagesAvailable Remedy
Money
Available in civil fraud cases under Fla. Stat. § 768.72 with proof of intentional misconduct or gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence.
RescissionAvailable Remedy
Equitable
Court unwinds the contract or transaction induced by fraud. Returns parties to their pre-transaction position. Available where money damages are inadequate.

Summary of Florida common-law fraud framework. Specific elements, defenses, and available remedies depend on the type of misrepresentation, the relationship between the parties, and the documentary record.

Litigation Approach

How a Fraud Case Gets Built

Civil fraud cases are built and defended on the documentary record. Strong fraud claims rest on emails, contracts, financial records, and contemporaneous communications that establish what was said, when, and what the other party knew. Strong fraud defense uses the same record to show disclosure, lack of reliance, or absence of damages.

Documentary Record Review

Fraud cases require careful collection of every email, text, contract draft, financial statement, and communication that bears on the alleged misrepresentation. Florida's heightened pleading standard for fraud (Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.120(b)) means the complaint has to plead fraud with particularity. The work to support that pleading begins with the records.

Element-by-Element Analysis

Every element of a fraud claim has to be proven. False statement, knowledge of falsity, intent to induce reliance, justifiable reliance, and damages. Cases are won and lost on the weakest element. Strong fraud claims have documentary or testimonial support for each. Strong defenses identify the missing element and challenge the case at that point.

Most fraud cases are decided on reliance, not on whether the statement was false.

Reliance and Materiality Challenges

Defense work often focuses on reliance and materiality. If the recipient knew the truth, did not rely on the statement, or could not have justifiably relied given red flags, the case may fail regardless of how false the statement was. Materiality challenges focus on whether the statement mattered to the decision.

Damages Proof and Remedy Selection

Damages have to be proven with reasonable certainty and tied causally to the misrepresentation. Out-of-pocket loss, benefit-of-the-bargain damages, consequential damages, punitive damages, and rescission each have their own proof requirements. Selecting the right remedy and supporting it with the right evidence drives the recovery.

Related Practice Areas

Related Civil Matters

Fraud claims frequently overlap with other civil litigation areas. Each related practice carries its own legal framework.

Business Disputes

Many fraud cases arise from broken business relationships. Coordinated business and fraud strategy can produce stronger leverage than either approach alone.

Learn More →

Contract Disputes

Fraud claims often run alongside breach of contract claims. The interplay between contract limitations periods and fraud limitations matters when one may be time-barred.

Learn More →

Commercial Litigation

High-stakes fraud cases involving substantial financial exposure or complex commercial relationships often overlap with broader commercial litigation strategy.

Learn More →

Civil Litigation

For fraud matters that span multiple categories or where the case posture requires broader civil litigation strategy.

Learn More →
Speak With Andre

Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000

Civil fraud claims are deadline-driven and document-heavy. The first conversation is the right time to assess the record, the elements, and the realistic remedies available. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter usually creates more options than calling late.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say

Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm.

THE FRANZEN FIRM profile picture
THE FRANZEN FIRM
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is a high integrity and highly effective litigator who practices law with the professionalism and civility that all lawyers should aspire to do so.
Larry Kantor profile picture
Larry Kantor
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere has represented me from a legal perspective over the years from traffic tickets, to automobile accidents, which I must say I have gotten some very strong settlements for injuries. Mr. Rouviere has always been attentive to responding to my calls and texts in a timely manner which is very important to me. He also is batting a 100% on traffic tickets I have gotten they represented me on. I would highly recommend Mr. Rouviere for any and all legal issues that u might have. If an issue is not in his wheel house then he would direct you to another attorney who specializes in that field.
Kim Lazar profile picture
Kim Lazar
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere’s law firm provides honest, trustworthy legal representation backed by knowledge and expertise. When you need help with traffic tickets or any legal matters, you can rely on his experience and commitment to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.
Vladimir Fernandez profile picture
Vladimir Fernandez
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This is the lawyer and law firm by far they really dig to tha end to help you I really recommend it
Maria Romero profile picture
Maria Romero
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Andre Rouviere is an exceptional legal professional with dedication to his clients . The attention is strong and his committed to achieve the best possible outcome making it possible to be trusted I highly respect him and recommend him . Thank you for always being helpful
Ron Morgan profile picture
Ron Morgan
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has been my attorney for over twenty years. He is always there for me. Always answers his phone. The best choice I have ever made for my attorney.
Angel Orozco profile picture
Angel Orozco
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had the privilege of having Andre Rouviere represent me on multiple occasions over the past 30 years, and I can confidently say that he is an exceptional attorney. His professionalism, knowledge, integrity, and dedication have consistently given me complete confidence in his representation. Over the years, Andre has always taken the time to understand my situation, explain my options clearly, and provide thoughtful and honest guidance. Knowing that I can turn to someone I trust, even after three decades, speaks volumes about the quality of his work and the relationship he builds with his clients. I highly recommend Andre Rouviere to anyone looking for an experienced, trustworthy, and dedicated attorney. Five stars without hesitation!
mrpmaniac profile picture
mrpmaniac
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Represented me for 30 years. Experienced knowlegable very professional personable and detailed oriented. Highly recommended
Morgan Clark profile picture
Morgan Clark
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was fortunate to have Andre Rouviere represent me after I was involved in a serious car accident. From the very beginning, he was there every step of the way, providing clear communication, guidance, and reassurance throughout the entire process. He always made me feel confident that we would achieve the best possible outcome, and he absolutely delivered. I would confidently recommend Mr. Rouviere to anyone in need of an outstanding attorney.