Federal Crimes Defense

Miami Federal Crimes Defense Attorney

Federal cases run on a different track than state cases across Miami-Dade and South Florida: its own prosecutors, its own sentencing exposure, and its own consequences. Pre-indictment representation is, in many cases, the most consequential stage of a federal case.

!
Federal sentences carry no parole. The federal system abolished parole in 1987, and defendants serve approximately 85% of the imposed sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). A federal year is not a state year.
★★★★★4.9 / 5.0
100+ Verified Client Reviews
Featured on Google · Avvo · LinkedIn
37+
Years of Practice
Florida Bar member since 1989
1991
SDFL Admitted
Southern District of Florida
2001
MDFL Admitted
Middle District of Florida
Boutique
Practice Model
Direct attorney involvement
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a target letter in a federal case?+
A target letter is a formal notice from the U.S. Attorney's Office that a person is the target of a federal grand jury investigation. It identifies the statutes under investigation and commonly invites the target to testify or produce documents. Receipt of a target letter is one of the strongest signals that federal charges may be coming, and it is the right time to engage federal counsel for pre-indictment representation.
What is the 85% rule in federal sentencing?+
The federal system abolished parole for offenses committed after November 1, 1987. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b), federal inmates can earn approximately 54 days of good-time credit per year, meaning they generally serve about 85% of the imposed sentence. A 10-year federal sentence translates to roughly 8.5 years served. Mandatory minimums must be served in full unless § 5K1.1 cooperation or safety-valve provisions apply.
What is the safety valve in federal cases?+
The safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) allows certain non-violent drug offenders to be sentenced below the mandatory minimum if they meet particular criteria, including limited criminal history points, no violence, no firearm use, no death or serious bodily injury, the defendant was not an organizer or leader, and the defendant has truthfully provided all information about the offense. The criteria are strict and the qualification analysis turns on the facts.
How do U.S. Sentencing Guidelines work?+
The Guidelines produce a recommended sentencing range based on the offense level (calculated from the conduct, harm, and adjustments) and the criminal history category (calculated from prior convictions). The judge calculates the range and then considers the § 3553(a) factors, which can result in a within-Guidelines, above-Guidelines, or below-Guidelines sentence. The Guidelines are advisory after Booker, but they must still be calculated correctly because the calculation anchors the entire sentencing conversation.
Should I cooperate with federal investigators?+
That decision should never be made without federal counsel. Cooperation can sometimes provide the only path below a mandatory minimum sentence, but it carries real consequences, including ongoing obligations, potential testimony against others, and irreversible disclosure of information. The decision turns on the facts of the case, the strength of the government's evidence, and what the government realistically wants in return.
What is § 924(c) and why does it matter?+
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) imposes mandatory minimum sentences for using or carrying a firearm during a crime of violence or drug trafficking offense. The minimums are 5 years for possession, 7 years for brandishing, and 10 years for discharge. These sentences run consecutive to the underlying offense sentence, meaning they stack rather than running together. § 924(c) charges substantially increase exposure.
Can a federal case be dismissed?+
Yes, in several ways. Pre-indictment, the U.S. Attorney's Office can decline to charge after consideration of representations from defense counsel. Post-indictment, motions to dismiss based on jurisdictional defects, suppression of essential evidence, multiplicity, or constitutional challenges can result in dismissal. The government can also dismiss as part of plea negotiations or in the interest of justice.
What is the difference between SDFL and MDFL?+
The Southern District of Florida (SDFL) covers Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, and other South Florida counties. The Middle District of Florida (MDFL) covers Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, and central Florida. Each district has a U.S. Attorney's Office, judges, local rules, and prosecutorial culture. Andre is admitted to both districts.
How long does a federal case take?+
Federal cases generally move faster than state cases. The Speedy Trial Act requires trial within 70 days of indictment unless excludable time applies, though most cases involve continuances for discovery and motion practice. From indictment to resolution, federal cases generally take 6 to 18 months for non-trial cases and longer for cases that go to trial. Pre-indictment investigations can run for months or years before charges are filed. This is a separate framework from Florida's state speedy trial rule, covered in our Criminal Case Timeline.
Can a federal conviction be sealed or expunged?+
Federal law does not provide a general expungement statute. Federal convictions generally remain on the record permanently. Pardons and certain narrow petitions exist but are exceptional. This is a real point of contrast with Florida state cases, where sealing and expungement are available in limited circumstances. See our full Legal Terms Glossary for how the state process works. Avoiding a conviction in the first place is the central reason pre-indictment representation carries so much weight.
Federal Case Lifecycle

How a Federal Case Unfolds

Federal cases unfold across several distinct stages. The defense posture changes at each stage, and acting too late at any stage can foreclose options that were available earlier. Earlier engagement opens more room to shape the case before charges are filed.

STAGE 01

Investigation Stage

Target letters, grand jury subpoenas, agent contacts. Pre-indictment intervention can sometimes prevent charges entirely.

STAGE 02

Indictment and Pretrial

Detention hearings, discovery, suppression motions, plea negotiations, and trial preparation in U.S. District Court.

STAGE 03

Federal Sentencing

U.S.S.G. Guidelines calculations, § 5K1.1 cooperation, § 3553(a) variance arguments, mitigation, and sentencing memoranda.

18 U.S.C. § 3624(b) :: No Parole

Federal Time Served vs. State Time Served

Federal sentences are calculated differently than state sentences. There is no parole in the federal system, and good-time credit is capped at roughly 54 days per year. A federal sentence carries more actual time than a state sentence of the same length.

85%
Time Served

The 85% Rule

Federal defendants serve roughly 85% of the imposed sentence with limited good-time credit. A 10-year sentence equals about 8.5 years served.

0
Federal Parole

No Parole System

Federal parole was abolished in 1987 for offenses after that date. Supervised release follows imprisonment, but it does not shorten the prison term.

5/7/10
Years Mandatory Consecutive

§ 924(c) Stacks

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) firearm enhancements add 5, 7, or 10 mandatory years in addition to the underlying sentence. They do not run together.

Federal Penalty Framework

Federal Charge Penalties

Federal statutory maximums are the starting point. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines determine the recommended range based on offense level and criminal history.

Charge
Statute
Statutory Maximum
Mandatory Minimum
Wire FraudInterstate wire communication
18 U.S.C. § 1343
20 years
None statutorily
Mail FraudUse of U.S. mail in scheme
18 U.S.C. § 1341
20 years
None statutorily
Drug ConspiracySchedule II drugs
21 U.S.C. § 846
Up to life
5/10/20 years By Weight
§ 924(c) FirearmCrime of violence or drug trafficking
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Life
5/7/10 years Consecutive
RICOPattern of racketeering
18 U.S.C. § 1962
20 years
None statutorily
Healthcare FraudFederal health programs
18 U.S.C. § 1347
10-20 years
None statutorily
Money LaunderingProceeds of crime
18 U.S.C. § 1956
20 years
None statutorily
Tax EvasionWillful evasion
26 U.S.C. § 7201
5 years per count
None statutorily

Summary of federal statutes. Statutory maximums are starting points. Actual sentences are determined by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and § 3553(a) factors. Mandatory minimums must be served in full unless § 5K1.1 substantial assistance or safety-valve provisions apply.

Defense Approach

How a Federal Case Gets Defended

Federal defense work is mostly about timing: when the defense gets involved, what the U.S. Attorney's Office knows, and how locked-in the charging theory has become. The earlier the engagement, the more room there is to move.

Pre-Indictment Representation

Where the case is still under investigation, counsel can engage with the U.S. Attorney's Office to address charging decisions before they are made. Target letters, grand jury subpoenas, and agent contacts are signals that the window is open. Pre-indictment work can sometimes prevent charges entirely, narrow the charges that are filed, or shape immunity and proffer arrangements before any evidence locks in.

Pre-indictment representation is the most consequential stage of a federal case.

Suppression and Motion Practice

Federal motion practice is the heart of pretrial defense. Fourth Amendment motions, Franks hearings on warrant defects, motions in limine, motions to dismiss for jurisdictional defects, and constitutional challenges all live here. Federal courts take these challenges seriously when they are well-supported. Discovery under Rule 16, the Jencks Act, Brady, and Giglio gets pressed at every stage.

Guidelines and Sentencing

Federal sentencing is a calculation under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines combined with § 3553(a) factors. The Guidelines range anchors the sentencing conversation, so the calculation has to be right. Offense characteristics, role-in-offense adjustments, acceptance of responsibility, criminal history scoring, departures, and variance arguments all get fought line by line. Many federal cases are decided at sentencing rather than trial.

Routes Below the Mandatory Minimum

The only routes below a federal mandatory minimum are cooperation under § 5K1.1, the safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) where applicable, or a finding of error in the Guidelines calculation. Cooperation is by motion of the government, not defendant request, and it has consequences that cannot be undone. The decision has to be evaluated case by case, with full understanding of what is being given up and what is realistically being received.

Related Defense Areas

Related Criminal Matters

State charges that commonly cross over into federal jurisdiction when interstate, weight, or conspiracy elements attach.

Drug Charges

State drug cases routinely become federal cases when interstate elements, weight thresholds, or conspiracy theories are involved.

Learn More →

Theft and Fraud

Wire fraud, mail fraud, and healthcare fraud commonly start as state-level allegations and become federal cases.

Learn More →

Weapon Charges

18 U.S.C. § 922(g) felon in possession, § 924(c) firearm cases, and ATF investigations cross over from state weapons cases.

Learn More →

Violent Crimes

Hobbs Act robbery, § 924(c) firearm enhancements, and RICO charges federalize violent crimes with interstate elements.

Learn More →
Cities We Serve

Federal Defense Across Miami-Dade and Broward

Local courts, arresting agencies, and case patterns vary by city. The pages below cover the details relevant to each area.

Speak With Andre

Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000

Federal cases reward early engagement. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter tends to create more options than calling late.

Client Reviews

What Our Clients Say

Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm across Miami-Dade and South Florida. See our full client testimonials page for more.

Posted on Google Google
Sandra Eiranova profile picture
Sandra Eiranova
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend this criminal defense attorney Andre A. Rouviere for his exceptional professionalism, attention to detail, and patience in handling my cousin’s case. From our very first interaction, he made me feel comfortable, safe, and confident that my cousin’s case was in capable hands. He took the time to listen carefully, explain the process, answer our questions, and address our concerns with patience and respect. His professionalism, dedication, and thorough approach gave me peace of mind during what could have been a very stressful experience. What impressed me most was the trust and confidence he inspired from the very beginning. I truly felt that we were being treated with care, respect, and genuine concern, rather than simply being another case. Finding an attorney, you can trust is extremely important, especially when dealing with a criminal matter, and I am grateful for the experience we had with him. I would absolutely recommend his services to anyone looking for a knowledgeable, professional, and trustworthy criminal defense attorney. The Law Office of Andre A. Rouviere in Coral Gables, Florida, is truly outstanding.
Posted on Google Google
Pilar Aviles profile picture
Pilar Aviles
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Andre Rouviere has assisted me now twice! I am very grateful for the diligent efforts he made to help us out both times. Andre communicated clearly and helped us navigate throughout the legal process so we understood everything throughout. I will always call him whenever I need help again in the future and cannot recommend him enough.
Posted on Google Google
Eddy's Dogs aka Eddy's K9 Rescue profile picture
Eddy's Dogs aka Eddy's K9 Rescue
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Absolutely recommend this law firm. They handled my case and I was amazed at the attention and information I got. I highly recommend them and will be using their services again.
Posted on Google Google
Carlos Zaldivar profile picture
Carlos Zaldivar
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is an exceptional lawyer. Andre represented me in a civil case and did an exceptional job when I was told not to bother with a suit. Andre succeeded, and I got my money back. I send all my friends to Andre
Posted on Google Google
Bob R profile picture
Bob R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has represented me, my family and friends on several legal matters. He is always available to provide sound, practical advice and more than willing and able to fight for you when necessary. It’s reassuring to have a qualified, experienced lawyer in my corner to protect me and my interests when I need it.

Owner's reply
Bob, thank you. Clients who return and who send their family and friends give me the highest compliment. I’m grateful for your confidence and I’m always here if you need me.
Posted on Google Google
Phil Glatzer profile picture
Phil Glatzer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
As an attorney, I have often referred my clients to André for legal work that I myself cannot handle and everyone has always been very satisfied with his representation. I highly recommend him.

Owner's reply
Thanks Phil. A referral from a colleague who knows the work means a great deal to me. I take every case you send my way seriously, and I’m glad the clients were well served.
Posted on Google Google
Pedro Carrera profile picture
Pedro Carrera
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can always count on him. An honest lawyer.

Owner's reply
Thanks Pedro.
Posted on Google Google
Gabriel Hernandez profile picture
Gabriel Hernandez
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Extremely quick and efficient . My ticket was handed and I didn’t have to worry about it once. His staff is also super helpful giving multiple updates on the status

Owner's reply
It's great to hear you were pleased. We are happy we were able to take the burden off your shoulders and resolve your issue for you.
Posted on Google Google
Andrew Varela profile picture
Andrew Varela
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
An amazing attorney who gives every case the care and attention it deserves. His attention to detail is exceptional, and it’s clear that he takes pride in his work and truly cares about his clients. I highly recommend him to anyone looking for a dedicated, thorough, and attentive attorney!

Owner's reply
I really appreciate that Andrew. Thank you.