Miami Theft & Fraud Defense Attorney
Florida theft and fraud cases across Miami-Dade and South Florida turn on intent and dollar amount. The same alleged conduct can be charged as a misdemeanor, a felony, or a federal indictment depending on the records, the amount, and the jurisdiction. The defense work has to engage all three possibilities early.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between petit theft and grand theft in Florida?+
Can a theft charge be dropped if I pay back the money?+
What is the difference between theft and fraud?+
When does a Florida theft case become a federal fraud case?+
What is the Florida Communications Fraud Act?+
Can theft charges be sealed or expunged in Florida?+
Should I talk to police or fraud investigators if they call?+
What is the statute of limitations for theft and fraud in Florida?+
What is aggregation in a Florida theft case?+
Do you handle theft and fraud cases outside Miami?+
Charging Layers for Theft and Fraud
A single set of facts in a Florida theft or fraud case can be charged in three different ways depending on dollar amount, records, and jurisdiction. The charging decision often happens before counsel is involved, which is why pre-charge work matters.
Misdemeanor Petit Theft
Allegations under $750 charged under § 812.014(2)(e) or (3). Tried in Miami-Dade County Court. Diversion and withhold of adjudication are often available.
Felony Grand Theft
$750 or more, or specific property categories like firearms or motor vehicles. Felony exposure under § 812.014(2). Tried in Miami-Dade Circuit Court.
Federal Wire or Mail Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud) and § 1343 (wire fraud) attach when interstate elements are involved. Up to 20 years per count in U.S. District Court.
Florida Theft Dollar Thresholds
Florida theft classification is driven by dollar amount. Crossing a threshold by even one dollar can change a misdemeanor to a felony, or a felony to a more serious one. Valuation is litigated, and aggregation is challengeable.
3rd-Degree Felony Threshold
Crossing $750 turns petit theft into grand theft 3rd-degree. Up to 5 years prison exposure.
2nd-Degree Felony Threshold
Above $20,000 becomes grand theft 2nd-degree. Up to 15 years prison exposure.
1st-Degree Felony Threshold
Above $100,000 becomes grand theft 1st-degree. Up to 30 years prison exposure.
Penalties Under § 812.014 and Related Statutes
Florida theft charges are tiered by dollar amount and property type. Specific property categories such as firearms or motor vehicles can elevate charges regardless of value.
Summary of Florida Statutes Chapter 812 and related provisions. Penalties vary by specific charge, prior record, property type, statutory enhancements, and federal sentencing factors. PRR refers to the Florida Prison Releasee Reoffender statute.
How a Theft or Fraud Case Gets Defended
Theft and fraud cases turn on three things: intent, dollar amount, and what the records really show. Defense work that gets to a good outcome usually engages on all three.
Intent and the Elements
Florida Statute § 812.014 requires the state to prove four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: that the person acted knowingly, that property was obtained or used, that the property belonged to another, and that there was intent to deprive the owner. Mistake of fact, claim of right, contractual disputes, and good-faith misunderstandings can all defeat the intent element. Theft is not an accident or a billing dispute. Fraud requires intent to deceive plus material misrepresentation that was relied upon.
Crossing a threshold by even one dollar can change a misdemeanor into a felony.
Valuation and Aggregation
Florida theft is tiered by dollar amount, and a single dollar over a threshold changes the charge. Valuation is litigated. Prosecutors sometimes aggregate multiple smaller transactions to push the total over a felony threshold, but the state must prove the transactions were part of a single scheme or course of conduct. Challenging valuation, contesting aggregation, and disputing how loss is calculated can drop a 1st-degree felony to a 3rd-degree felony, or a felony to a misdemeanor.
Records and Federal Jurisdiction
Theft and fraud cases are built on documents: bank statements, transaction records, emails, contracts, surveillance video, audit reports. Comprehensive records review is foundational. Federal jurisdiction can attach when interstate communications, U.S. mail, banks, or federally regulated entities are involved. Wire fraud (§ 1343) and mail fraud (§ 1341) are charged in counts that can stack rather than merge, with up to 20 years per count.
The First 48 Hours
What happens in the first 48 hours after a theft or fraud allegation matters substantially. Statements made before counsel is involved often become the strongest evidence at trial. Returning property to "make it right" can be used as an admission of intent. Records and communications, including older material, should be preserved (not destroyed). Social media activity should stop. Pre-charge representation can shape how the State Attorney's Office charges, declines, or diverts a case, and once charges are filed, the available options narrow. See our full Bail and Bond Guide and Criminal Case Timeline.
Related Criminal Matters
Theft and fraud cases frequently overlap with other charges. Each related area carries its own defense framework and potential exposure.
Federal Crimes
State theft and fraud cases routinely become federal cases when interstate elements attach. Wire fraud and mail fraud counts can stack with up to 20 years per count.
Learn More →Drug Charges
Prescription fraud, drug-related theft, and healthcare fraud cases often combine theft and drug charges. Defense strategy has to address both.
Learn More →Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000
Charging decisions in theft and fraud cases get made fast, often before counsel is involved. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter usually creates more options than calling late.
What Clients Say
Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm.
THE FRANZEN FIRMTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is a high integrity and highly effective litigator who practices law with the professionalism and civility that all lawyers should aspire to do so.
Larry KantorTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere has represented me from a legal perspective over the years from traffic tickets, to automobile accidents, which I must say I have gotten some very strong settlements for injuries. Mr. Rouviere has always been attentive to responding to my calls and texts in a timely manner which is very important to me. He also is batting a 100% on traffic tickets I have gotten they represented me on. I would highly recommend Mr. Rouviere for any and all legal issues that u might have. If an issue is not in his wheel house then he would direct you to another attorney who specializes in that field.
Kim LazarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere’s law firm provides honest, trustworthy legal representation backed by knowledge and expertise. When you need help with traffic tickets or any legal matters, you can rely on his experience and commitment to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.
Vladimir FernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This is the lawyer and law firm by far they really dig to tha end to help you I really recommend it
Maria RomeroTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Andre Rouviere is an exceptional legal professional with dedication to his clients . The attention is strong and his committed to achieve the best possible outcome making it possible to be trusted I highly respect him and recommend him . Thank you for always being helpful
Ron MorganTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has been my attorney for over twenty years. He is always there for me. Always answers his phone. The best choice I have ever made for my attorney.
Angel OrozcoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had the privilege of having Andre Rouviere represent me on multiple occasions over the past 30 years, and I can confidently say that he is an exceptional attorney. His professionalism, knowledge, integrity, and dedication have consistently given me complete confidence in his representation. Over the years, Andre has always taken the time to understand my situation, explain my options clearly, and provide thoughtful and honest guidance. Knowing that I can turn to someone I trust, even after three decades, speaks volumes about the quality of his work and the relationship he builds with his clients. I highly recommend Andre Rouviere to anyone looking for an experienced, trustworthy, and dedicated attorney. Five stars without hesitation!
mrpmaniacTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Represented me for 30 years. Experienced knowlegable very professional personable and detailed oriented. Highly recommended
Morgan ClarkTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was fortunate to have Andre Rouviere represent me after I was involved in a serious car accident. From the very beginning, he was there every step of the way, providing clear communication, guidance, and reassurance throughout the entire process. He always made me feel confident that we would achieve the best possible outcome, and he absolutely delivered. I would confidently recommend Mr. Rouviere to anyone in need of an outstanding attorney.
