Miami Motorcycle Accident Attorney
Severe trauma cases involving disputed fault, visibility defenses, and complex damages across Miami-Dade and South Florida. Plaintiff and defense representation across South Florida.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Florida PIP cover motorcycle riders?+
Does the no-fault threshold apply to motorcycle accidents?+
What does Florida's helmet law require?+
What happens if the at-fault driver claims they didn't see me?+
How long do I have to file a motorcycle accident claim in Florida?+
Is lane splitting legal in Florida?+
What if the at-fault driver has no insurance?+
What does it cost to hire a motorcycle accident attorney?+
How long does a motorcycle accident case take?+
Does the firm represent both plaintiffs and defendants?+
Why Motorcycle Cases Are Different from Car Cases
Florida motorcycle accidents operate under a different statutory framework than passenger vehicle cases. Florida PIP does not apply, the no-fault threshold is not a barrier to non-economic damages, and the helmet law creates its own comparative negligence exposure. The strategy starts from a different starting point.
Liability & Visibility Defense
"I didn't see the motorcycle" is the most common defense. Scene reconstruction, sight-line analysis, traffic patterns, and helmet-cam or dashcam footage become decisive. Florida is a modified comparative negligence state under HB 837.
Insurance Without PIP
PIP under Fla. Stat. § 627.736 does not cover motorcycle riders. Recovery comes from third-party liability, UM/UIM coverage, the rider's health insurance, and any med-pay coverage available.
Catastrophic Injury Damages
Severe orthopedic injuries, traumatic brain injuries, and permanent impairment are the rule, not the exception. Future medical care, lost earning capacity, and life-care planning typically drive damages.
The Statutes That Define These Cases
Motorcycle accident cases turn on several Florida statutory frameworks that operate together. Each affects strategy and recovery in a different way. Understanding how they interact at the outset shapes the case.
Negligence SOL
For accidents on or after March 24, 2023, the statute of limitations is 2 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). HB 837 cut this from the prior 4-year period.
Helmet Statute
Florida riders 21 and older with at least $10,000 in medical insurance may ride without a helmet under Fla. Stat. § 316.211. Helmet absence affects head-injury comparative fault.
HB 837 Modified Comparative
Florida is a modified comparative negligence state. A finding of more than 50% rider fault bars recovery entirely. Fault below 50% reduces the recovery proportionally.
Both Sides of Motorcycle Litigation
The firm represents both injured riders pursuing claims and drivers, businesses, or insureds defending claims. The strategy is different on each side, but the underlying preparation and discipline is the same.
Plaintiff Representation
- Liability development and visibility-defense rebuttal
- Scene reconstruction and sight-line analysis
- UM/UIM coverage analysis given Florida's high uninsured rate
- Health insurance, med-pay, and third-party coordination
- Catastrophic damages with life-care planning where indicated
- Comparative negligence analysis including helmet-law issues
Defense Representation
- Liability defense including comparative fault under HB 837 50% bar
- Helmet-law analysis where applicable to head-injury damages
- Damages challenges and pre-existing condition analysis
- Discovery, IME coordination, and defense preparation work
- Settlement evaluation and offer of judgment strategy
- Trial defense and post-judgment positioning
Available Coverage Tracks
Motorcycle riders in Florida operate without PIP. Identifying every available recovery source at the start of the case is essential.
Summary of Florida motorcycle accident coverage and recovery framework. Specific availability, policy limits, and recovery amounts depend on the policies involved, the facts of the accident, the comparative negligence findings, helmet law application to head-injury damages, and other factors.
How a Motorcycle Case Gets Built
Motorcycle accident cases require a different starting framework than passenger vehicle cases. The absence of PIP, the visibility-defense problem, and the catastrophic injury patterns typical in these matters all change the case-development arc from day one.
Liability and the Visibility Defense
Defendants in motorcycle cases routinely claim they did not see the rider. The defense rests on Florida's modified comparative negligence framework: if rider fault can be pushed above 50%, recovery is barred. Scene photographs, sight-line analysis, traffic patterns, vehicle damage, and helmet-cam or dashcam footage all become evidence in the visibility-defense rebuttal. Cases where the defense narrative was challenged early settle differently than cases where it was allowed to harden.
In a motorcycle case, the defendant's first sentence to the officer at the scene usually becomes the defense theory at trial.
Coverage Analysis Without PIP
Florida motorcycle riders operate without PIP coverage. The recovery sources are different from car cases: the rider's UM and UIM coverage, the at-fault driver's bodily injury liability, any med-pay coverage on the motorcycle policy, the rider's health insurance, and any other applicable coverages. Identifying and securing every available source on day one is essential, particularly given the high uninsured rate among Florida drivers.
Medical Treatment and Damages
Motorcycle injuries tend toward the catastrophic end of the spectrum: orthopedic trauma, traumatic brain injury, road rash, and permanent impairment. The medical record drives the third-party damages claim. Continuous treatment with the appropriate treating physicians, neuropsychological testing where TBI is suspected, and life-care planning for cases involving permanent impairment all build the damages claim.
Helmet Law and Comparative Fault
Florida riders 21 and older with at least $10,000 in medical insurance may ride without a helmet. The presence or absence of a helmet does not by itself bar recovery, but in head-injury cases it can affect comparative fault for the head-injury component of damages. Cases involving head injury and no helmet require careful damages segregation and qualified medical support.
Litigation Readiness
Insurance carriers contest motorcycle cases hard, often relying on jurors' general bias against motorcyclists. The cases that resolve on favorable terms are the ones where the carrier knows the case will be tried. Filing suit, completing discovery, taking the at-fault driver's deposition, and pushing toward trial often produces the resolution. The settlement that compensates the injured rider typically comes when the carrier sees the case is being prepared seriously.
Related Personal Injury Matters
Motorcycle accident cases frequently overlap with other personal injury areas. Each related practice carries its own framework.
Car Accidents
Passenger vehicle collisions involving Florida no-fault PIP, third-party liability, UM/UIM, and the no-fault threshold for non-economic damages.
Learn More →Truck Accidents
Commercial vehicle collisions involving federal motor carrier regulations, layered insurance, and corporate defendants.
Learn More →Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000
Motorcycle cases turn on early evidence and quick coverage analysis. Cases that resolve well are the ones where counsel was engaged early, the visibility defense was challenged, and the available coverage tracks were identified from day one. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter usually creates more options than calling late.
What Clients Say
Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm.
THE FRANZEN FIRMTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is a high integrity and highly effective litigator who practices law with the professionalism and civility that all lawyers should aspire to do so.
Larry KantorTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere has represented me from a legal perspective over the years from traffic tickets, to automobile accidents, which I must say I have gotten some very strong settlements for injuries. Mr. Rouviere has always been attentive to responding to my calls and texts in a timely manner which is very important to me. He also is batting a 100% on traffic tickets I have gotten they represented me on. I would highly recommend Mr. Rouviere for any and all legal issues that u might have. If an issue is not in his wheel house then he would direct you to another attorney who specializes in that field.
Kim LazarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere’s law firm provides honest, trustworthy legal representation backed by knowledge and expertise. When you need help with traffic tickets or any legal matters, you can rely on his experience and commitment to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.
Vladimir FernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This is the lawyer and law firm by far they really dig to tha end to help you I really recommend it
Maria RomeroTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Andre Rouviere is an exceptional legal professional with dedication to his clients . The attention is strong and his committed to achieve the best possible outcome making it possible to be trusted I highly respect him and recommend him . Thank you for always being helpful
Ron MorganTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has been my attorney for over twenty years. He is always there for me. Always answers his phone. The best choice I have ever made for my attorney.
Angel OrozcoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had the privilege of having Andre Rouviere represent me on multiple occasions over the past 30 years, and I can confidently say that he is an exceptional attorney. His professionalism, knowledge, integrity, and dedication have consistently given me complete confidence in his representation. Over the years, Andre has always taken the time to understand my situation, explain my options clearly, and provide thoughtful and honest guidance. Knowing that I can turn to someone I trust, even after three decades, speaks volumes about the quality of his work and the relationship he builds with his clients. I highly recommend Andre Rouviere to anyone looking for an experienced, trustworthy, and dedicated attorney. Five stars without hesitation!
mrpmaniacTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Represented me for 30 years. Experienced knowlegable very professional personable and detailed oriented. Highly recommended
Morgan ClarkTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was fortunate to have Andre Rouviere represent me after I was involved in a serious car accident. From the very beginning, he was there every step of the way, providing clear communication, guidance, and reassurance throughout the entire process. He always made me feel confident that we would achieve the best possible outcome, and he absolutely delivered. I would confidently recommend Mr. Rouviere to anyone in need of an outstanding attorney.
