Miami Motorcycle Accident Attorney
Severe trauma cases involving disputed fault, visibility defenses, and complex damages across Miami-Dade and South Florida. Plaintiff and defense representation across South Florida.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Florida PIP cover motorcycle riders?+
Does the no-fault threshold apply to motorcycle accidents?+
What does Florida's helmet law require?+
What happens if the at-fault driver claims they didn't see me?+
How long do I have to file a motorcycle accident claim in Florida?+
Is lane splitting legal in Florida?+
What if the at-fault driver has no insurance?+
What does it cost to hire a motorcycle accident attorney?+
How long does a motorcycle accident case take?+
Does the firm represent both plaintiffs and defendants?+
Why Motorcycle Cases Are Different from Car Cases
Florida motorcycle accidents operate under a different statutory framework than passenger vehicle cases. Florida PIP does not apply, the no-fault threshold is not a barrier to non-economic damages, and the helmet law creates comparative negligence exposure. The strategy starts from a different starting point.
Liability & Visibility Defense
"I didn't see the motorcycle" is the most common defense. Scene reconstruction, sight-line analysis, traffic patterns, and helmet-cam or dashcam footage become decisive. Florida is a modified comparative negligence state under HB 837.
Insurance Without PIP
PIP under Fla. Stat. § 627.736 does not cover motorcycle riders. Recovery comes from third-party liability, UM/UIM coverage, the rider's health insurance, and any med-pay coverage available.
Catastrophic Injury Damages
Severe orthopedic injuries, traumatic brain injuries, and permanent impairment are the rule, not the exception. Future medical care, lost earning capacity, and life-care planning generally drive damages.
The Statutes That Define These Cases
Motorcycle accident cases turn on several Florida statutory frameworks that operate together. Each affects strategy and recovery in a different way. Understanding how they interact at the outset shapes the case.
Negligence SOL
For accidents on or after March 24, 2023, the statute of limitations is 2 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). HB 837 cut this from the prior 4-year period.
Helmet Statute
Florida riders 21 and older with at least $10,000 in medical insurance may ride without a helmet under Fla. Stat. § 316.211. Helmet absence affects head-injury comparative fault.
HB 837 Modified Comparative
Florida is a modified comparative negligence state. A finding of more than 50% rider fault bars recovery entirely. Fault below 50% reduces the recovery proportionally.
Both Sides of Motorcycle Litigation
The firm represents both injured riders pursuing claims and drivers, businesses, or insureds defending claims. The strategy is different on each side, but the underlying preparation and discipline is the same.
Plaintiff Representation
- Liability development and visibility-defense rebuttal
- Scene reconstruction and sight-line analysis
- UM/UIM coverage analysis given Florida's high uninsured rate
- Health insurance, med-pay, and third-party coordination
- Catastrophic damages with life-care planning where indicated
- Comparative negligence analysis including helmet-law issues
Defense Representation
- Liability defense including comparative fault under HB 837 50% bar
- Helmet-law analysis where applicable to head-injury damages
- Damages challenges and pre-existing condition analysis
- Discovery, IME coordination, and defense preparation work
- Settlement evaluation and offer of judgment strategy
- Trial defense and post-judgment positioning
Available Coverage Tracks
Motorcycle riders in Florida operate without PIP. Identifying every available recovery source at the start of the case is essential.
Summary of Florida motorcycle accident coverage and recovery framework. Availability, policy limits, and recovery amounts depend on the policies involved, the facts of the accident, the comparative negligence findings, helmet law application to head-injury damages, and other factors.
How a Motorcycle Case Gets Built
Motorcycle accident cases require a different starting framework than passenger vehicle cases. The absence of PIP, the visibility-defense problem, and the catastrophic injury patterns typical in these matters all change the case-development arc from day one.
Liability and the Visibility Defense
Defendants in motorcycle cases routinely claim they did not see the rider. The defense rests on Florida's modified comparative negligence framework: if rider fault can be pushed above 50%, recovery is barred. Scene photographs, sight-line analysis, traffic patterns, vehicle damage, and helmet-cam or dashcam footage all become evidence in the visibility-defense rebuttal. Cases where the defense narrative was challenged early settle differently than cases where it was allowed to harden.
In a motorcycle case, the defendant's first sentence to the officer at the scene in most cases becomes the defense theory at trial.
Coverage Analysis Without PIP
Florida motorcycle riders operate without PIP coverage. The recovery sources are different from car cases: the rider's UM and UIM coverage, the at-fault driver's bodily injury liability, any med-pay coverage on the motorcycle policy, the rider's health insurance, and any other applicable coverages. Identifying and securing every available source on day one is essential, particularly given the high uninsured rate among Florida drivers.
Medical Treatment and Damages
Motorcycle injuries tend toward the catastrophic end of the spectrum: orthopedic trauma, traumatic brain injury, road rash, and permanent impairment. The medical record drives the third-party damages claim. Continuous treatment with the appropriate treating physicians, neuropsychological testing where TBI is suspected, and life-care planning for cases involving permanent impairment all build the damages claim.
Helmet Law and Comparative Fault
Florida riders 21 and older with at least $10,000 in medical insurance may ride without a helmet. The presence or absence of a helmet does not by itself bar recovery, but in head-injury cases it can affect comparative fault for the head-injury component of damages. Cases involving head injury and no helmet require careful damages segregation and qualified medical support.
Litigation Readiness
Insurance carriers contest motorcycle cases hard, in many cases relying on jurors' general bias against motorcyclists. The cases that resolve on favorable terms are the ones where the carrier knows the case will be tried. Filing suit, completing discovery, taking the at-fault driver's deposition, and pushing toward trial generally produces the resolution. The settlement that compensates the injured rider generally comes when the carrier sees the case is being prepared seriously.
Related Personal Injury Matters
Motorcycle accident cases commonly overlap with other personal injury areas. Related practices follow different frameworks.
Car Accidents
Passenger vehicle collisions involving Florida no-fault PIP, third-party liability, UM/UIM, and the no-fault threshold for non-economic damages.
Learn More →Truck Accidents
Commercial vehicle collisions involving federal motor carrier regulations, layered insurance, and corporate defendants.
Learn More →Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000
Motorcycle cases turn on early evidence and quick coverage analysis. Cases that resolve well are the ones where counsel was engaged early, the visibility defense was challenged, and the available coverage tracks were identified from day one. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter generally creates more options than calling late.
What Our Clients Say
Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm across Miami-Dade and South Florida. See our full client testimonials page for more.
Posted on Google![]()
Eddy's Dogs aka Eddy's K9 RescueTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Absolutely recommend this law firm. They handled my case and I was amazed at the attention and information I got. I highly recommend them and will be using their services again.Posted on Google![]()
Carlos ZaldivarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is an exceptional lawyer. Andre represented me in a civil case and did an exceptional job when I was told not to bother with a suit. Andre succeeded, and I got my money back. I send all my friends to AndrePosted on Google![]()
Bob RTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has represented me, my family and friends on several legal matters. He is always available to provide sound, practical advice and more than willing and able to fight for you when necessary. It’s reassuring to have a qualified, experienced lawyer in my corner to protect me and my interests when I need it.
Owner's reply
Bob, thank you. Clients who return and who send their family and friends give me the highest compliment. I’m grateful for your confidence and I’m always here if you need me.Posted on Google![]()
Phil GlatzerTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
As an attorney, I have often referred my clients to André for legal work that I myself cannot handle and everyone has always been very satisfied with his representation. I highly recommend him.
Owner's reply
Thanks Phil. A referral from a colleague who knows the work means a great deal to me. I take every case you send my way seriously, and I’m glad the clients were well served.Posted on Google![]()
Pedro CarreraTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can always count on him. An honest lawyer.
Owner's reply
Thanks Pedro.Posted on Google![]()
Gabriel HernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Extremely quick and efficient . My ticket was handed and I didn’t have to worry about it once. His staff is also super helpful giving multiple updates on the status
Owner's reply
It's great to hear you were pleased. We are happy we were able to take the burden off your shoulders and resolve your issue for you.Posted on Google![]()
Andrew VarelaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
An amazing attorney who gives every case the care and attention it deserves. His attention to detail is exceptional, and it’s clear that he takes pride in his work and truly cares about his clients. I highly recommend him to anyone looking for a dedicated, thorough, and attentive attorney!
Owner's reply
I really appreciate that Andrew. Thank you.Posted on Google![]()
Daniel HernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend this law firm! I had a ticket, and they kept me updated and got it dismissed. Kaylee was my go-to for communication, and Andre is excellent at what he does.
Owner's reply
Thanks Daniel. I am glad we were able to resolve your issue.
