Miami Federal Crimes Defense Attorney
Federal cases run on a different track than state cases across Miami-Dade and South Florida: different prosecutors, different sentencing, different consequences. Pre-indictment representation is often the most consequential stage of a federal case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a target letter in a federal case?+
What is the 85% rule in federal sentencing?+
What is the safety valve in federal cases?+
How do U.S. Sentencing Guidelines work?+
Should I cooperate with federal investigators?+
What is § 924(c) and why does it matter?+
Can a federal case be dismissed?+
What is the difference between SDFL and MDFL?+
How long does a federal case take?+
Can a federal conviction be sealed or expunged?+
How a Federal Case Unfolds
Federal cases unfold across several distinct stages. The defense posture changes at each stage, and acting too late at any stage can foreclose options that were available earlier. Earlier engagement opens more room to shape the case before charges are filed.
Investigation Stage
Target letters, grand jury subpoenas, agent contacts. Pre-indictment intervention can sometimes prevent charges entirely.
Indictment and Pretrial
Detention hearings, discovery, suppression motions, plea negotiations, and trial preparation in U.S. District Court.
Federal Sentencing
U.S.S.G. Guidelines calculations, § 5K1.1 cooperation, § 3553(a) variance arguments, mitigation, and sentencing memoranda.
Federal Time Served vs. State Time Served
Federal sentences are calculated differently than state sentences. There is no parole in the federal system, and good-time credit is capped at roughly 54 days per year. A federal sentence carries more actual time than a state sentence of the same length.
The 85% Rule
Federal defendants serve roughly 85% of the imposed sentence with limited good-time credit. A 10-year sentence equals about 8.5 years served.
No Parole System
Federal parole was abolished in 1987 for offenses after that date. Supervised release follows imprisonment, but it does not shorten the prison term.
§ 924(c) Stacks
18 U.S.C. § 924(c) firearm enhancements add 5, 7, or 10 mandatory years in addition to the underlying sentence. They do not run together.
Federal Charge Penalties
Federal statutory maximums are the starting point. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines determine the recommended range based on offense level and criminal history.
Summary of federal statutes. Statutory maximums are starting points. Actual sentences are determined by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and § 3553(a) factors. Mandatory minimums must be served in full unless § 5K1.1 substantial assistance or safety-valve provisions apply.
How a Federal Case Gets Defended
Federal defense work is mostly about timing: when the defense gets involved, what the U.S. Attorney's Office knows, and how locked-in the charging theory has become. The earlier the engagement, the more room there is to move.
Pre-Indictment Representation
Where the case is still under investigation, counsel can engage with the U.S. Attorney's Office to address charging decisions before they are made. Target letters, grand jury subpoenas, and agent contacts are signals that the window is open. Pre-indictment work can sometimes prevent charges entirely, narrow the charges that are filed, or shape immunity and proffer arrangements before any evidence locks in.
Pre-indictment representation is the most consequential stage of a federal case.
Suppression and Motion Practice
Federal motion practice is the heart of pretrial defense. Fourth Amendment motions, Franks hearings on warrant defects, motions in limine, motions to dismiss for jurisdictional defects, and constitutional challenges all live here. Federal courts take these challenges seriously when they are well-supported. Discovery under Rule 16, the Jencks Act, Brady, and Giglio gets pressed at every stage.
Guidelines and Sentencing
Federal sentencing is a calculation under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines combined with § 3553(a) factors. The Guidelines range anchors the sentencing conversation, so the calculation has to be right. Specific offense characteristics, role-in-offense adjustments, acceptance of responsibility, criminal history scoring, departures, and variance arguments all get fought line by line. Many federal cases are decided at sentencing rather than trial.
Routes Below the Mandatory Minimum
The only routes below a federal mandatory minimum are cooperation under § 5K1.1, the safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) where applicable, or a finding of error in the Guidelines calculation. Cooperation is by motion of the government, not defendant request, and it has consequences that cannot be undone. The decision has to be evaluated case by case, with full understanding of what is being given up and what is realistically being received.
Related Criminal Matters
State charges that often cross over into federal jurisdiction when interstate, weight, or conspiracy elements attach.
Drug Charges
State drug cases routinely become federal cases when interstate elements, weight thresholds, or conspiracy theories are involved.
Learn More →Theft and Fraud
Wire fraud, mail fraud, and healthcare fraud frequently start as state-level allegations and become federal cases.
Learn More →Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000
Federal cases reward early engagement. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter usually creates more options than calling late.
What Clients Say
Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm.
THE FRANZEN FIRMTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is a high integrity and highly effective litigator who practices law with the professionalism and civility that all lawyers should aspire to do so.
Larry KantorTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere has represented me from a legal perspective over the years from traffic tickets, to automobile accidents, which I must say I have gotten some very strong settlements for injuries. Mr. Rouviere has always been attentive to responding to my calls and texts in a timely manner which is very important to me. He also is batting a 100% on traffic tickets I have gotten they represented me on. I would highly recommend Mr. Rouviere for any and all legal issues that u might have. If an issue is not in his wheel house then he would direct you to another attorney who specializes in that field.
Kim LazarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere’s law firm provides honest, trustworthy legal representation backed by knowledge and expertise. When you need help with traffic tickets or any legal matters, you can rely on his experience and commitment to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.
Vladimir FernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This is the lawyer and law firm by far they really dig to tha end to help you I really recommend it
Maria RomeroTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Andre Rouviere is an exceptional legal professional with dedication to his clients . The attention is strong and his committed to achieve the best possible outcome making it possible to be trusted I highly respect him and recommend him . Thank you for always being helpful
Ron MorganTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has been my attorney for over twenty years. He is always there for me. Always answers his phone. The best choice I have ever made for my attorney.
Angel OrozcoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had the privilege of having Andre Rouviere represent me on multiple occasions over the past 30 years, and I can confidently say that he is an exceptional attorney. His professionalism, knowledge, integrity, and dedication have consistently given me complete confidence in his representation. Over the years, Andre has always taken the time to understand my situation, explain my options clearly, and provide thoughtful and honest guidance. Knowing that I can turn to someone I trust, even after three decades, speaks volumes about the quality of his work and the relationship he builds with his clients. I highly recommend Andre Rouviere to anyone looking for an experienced, trustworthy, and dedicated attorney. Five stars without hesitation!
mrpmaniacTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Represented me for 30 years. Experienced knowlegable very professional personable and detailed oriented. Highly recommended
Morgan ClarkTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was fortunate to have Andre Rouviere represent me after I was involved in a serious car accident. From the very beginning, he was there every step of the way, providing clear communication, guidance, and reassurance throughout the entire process. He always made me feel confident that we would achieve the best possible outcome, and he absolutely delivered. I would confidently recommend Mr. Rouviere to anyone in need of an outstanding attorney.
