Home/ Practice Areas/ Personal Injury/ Premises Liability
Premises Liability Representation

Miami Premises Liability Attorney

Slip-and-fall, unsafe property conditions, negligent maintenance, and negligent security cases under Florida invitee, licensee, and trespasser law across Miami-Dade and South Florida. Plaintiff and defense representation across South Florida.

!
Florida slip-and-fall claims require notice proof. Under Fla. Stat. § 768.0755, the injured person must show the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition. Surveillance video and incident reports preserve the case.
★★★★★4.8 / 5.0
100+ Verified Client Reviews
Featured on Google · Avvo · LinkedIn
35+
Years of Practice
Florida Bar member since 1989
1989
Florida Bar Licensed
University of Miami School of Law
State & Federal
Court Admission
SDFL (1991), MDFL (2001)
Boutique
Practice Model
Direct attorney involvement
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as a premises liability case in Florida?+
A premises liability case involves injury caused by an unsafe condition on someone else's property. Common examples: slip-and-fall on wet floors, trip-and-fall on uneven walkways, falls on defective stairs, injuries from inadequate security, dog bites, swimming pool injuries, and apartment or condo defects. The case requires proof that the property owner owed a duty to the injured person, breached that duty, and caused real injury.
What is Florida's slip-and-fall statute and why is it strict?+
Florida's slip-and-fall statute, Fla. Stat. § 768.0755, requires the injured person to prove the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the transitory substance (water, food, spilled product) that caused the fall. Constructive knowledge can be shown by evidence that the substance existed for a length of time such that the business should have discovered it through ordinary care, or that the condition occurred with regularity. Florida courts apply this statute strictly. Surveillance video and inspection logs are often the deciding evidence.
What is the difference between an invitee, licensee, and trespasser?+
Three classes of property visitors exist under Florida law, each owed a different duty. A business invitee (customer at a store, hotel guest) is owed the duty to keep the premises reasonably safe and to warn of known dangers. A licensee (social guest, friend visiting your home) is owed a lesser duty: to warn of known dangerous conditions and not to set traps. A trespasser is generally owed only the duty not to be willfully injured, with limited exceptions for known frequent trespassers and child trespassers under attractive nuisance. Visitor status determines the standard of care that applies. See our full Legal Terms Glossary for more Florida-specific definitions.
What is the open and obvious doctrine?+
The open and obvious doctrine is a defense that argues a property owner has no duty to warn of conditions that should be readily apparent to a reasonable person. The defense applies in cases involving conditions like clearly visible curbs, marked steps, or obvious hazards. It has limits. The doctrine does not eliminate the duty to maintain the premises reasonably safe in the first place. Whether a condition was open and obvious is often a fact issue for the jury.
What is a negligent security case?+
A negligent security case involves injury from a third-party criminal act (assault, sexual assault, robbery, shooting) on someone else's property where the property owner failed to provide adequate security. The case turns on foreseeability: whether the property owner knew or should have known of the risk based on prior similar incidents, the surrounding crime rate, or other warning signs. Apartment complexes, hotels, bars, and parking lots are common settings. Damages tend to be severe given the violent nature of the underlying crimes.
How long do I have to file a premises liability claim in Florida?+
For injuries on or after March 24, 2023, the statute of limitations is 2 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). HB 837 cut this from the prior 4-year period. The deadline is strict. Missing the statute of limitations permanently bars the claim. Wrongful death is also 2 years under § 95.11(4)(d). Claims against government entities require pre-suit notice under § 768.28 within 3 years. See our full Florida Statute of Limitations reference guide for the complete breakdown by case type.
What evidence should I gather after a premises injury?+
Photographs of the dangerous condition, the scene, and the surrounding area. The names and contact information of any witnesses. The incident report number if one was filled out. The names of any employees who responded. Receipts showing your presence at the property if applicable. Medical treatment records starting from the injury onward. The faster this evidence is gathered, the stronger the case typically becomes. Conditions can be cleaned or repaired and surveillance video overwritten within days.
What if I was partially at fault for the injury?+
Florida is a modified comparative negligence state under HB 837. The injured person's percentage of fault reduces the recovery proportionally. A finding of more than 50% plaintiff fault bars recovery entirely. Even where some plaintiff fault exists, recovery is often available if the property owner's share of fault remains greater than 50%. Each case turns on the specific facts of the visitor's conduct and the property condition.
What does it cost to hire a premises liability attorney?+
Premises liability cases are typically handled on contingency for plaintiff representation: the attorney is paid a percentage of the recovery only if there is a recovery. There is no upfront fee. Costs (filing fees, consultant fees, deposition costs) are typically advanced by the firm and reimbursed at resolution. Defense representation is structured differently, typically on hourly or flat-fee arrangements. See our full Contingency Fee Guide for the exact percentages Florida law allows.
Does the firm represent both plaintiffs and defendants?+
Yes. The firm represents both injured visitors pursuing claims and property owners, businesses, or insurers facing claims. Each side requires different strategy, but the underlying preparation, document review, and disciplined approach to the case is the same. Conflicts are screened at intake on every matter.
Three Layers of Premises Cases

How Premises Cases Are Built

Florida premises liability turns on visitor classification, notice of the dangerous condition, and proof of causation. Property owners and their insurers contest these cases hard, often relying on the open-and-obvious doctrine and comparative fault arguments. Each layer requires distinct development from day one.

LAYER 01

Visitor Status & Duty Owed

Florida law distinguishes between business invitees, licensees, and trespassers. The duty of care varies significantly. Most cases involve invitees, who are owed the highest duty.

LAYER 02

Notice & Knowledge

Most cases turn on what the property owner knew or should have known. Slip-and-fall cases under Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 require proof of actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition.

LAYER 03

Causation & Damages

The dangerous condition must have caused the injury. Pre-existing conditions, alternative explanations, and comparative fault all become defense theories addressed through medical and scene proof.

Three Florida Frameworks

The Statutes That Define These Cases

Premises liability cases in Florida operate under several statutory frameworks. Each affects strategy and recovery in a different way. Visitor classification, notice proof, and the SOL all matter from day one.

2
Years / Statute of Limitations

Negligence SOL

For injuries on or after March 24, 2023, the statute of limitations is 2 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). HB 837 cut this from the prior 4-year period.

§
Slip-and-Fall Statute

FS 768.0755

Florida slip-and-fall statute requires the injured person to prove the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the transitory substance that caused the fall.

50
% / Comparative Bar

HB 837 Modified Comparative

Florida is a modified comparative negligence state. A finding of more than 50% plaintiff fault bars recovery entirely. Fault below 50% reduces the recovery proportionally.

Plaintiff & Defense Representation

Both Sides of Premises Litigation

The firm represents both injured visitors pursuing claims and property owners, businesses, or insurers defending claims. The strategy is different on each side, but the underlying preparation and discipline is the same.

Pursuing a Claim

Plaintiff Representation

  • Visitor status analysis and duty-owed determination
  • Notice proof under Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 for slip-and-fall
  • Surveillance video preservation and maintenance record discovery
  • Negligent security analysis when third-party crime is involved
  • Damages development including future medical and life-care planning
  • Comparative fault rebuttal and open-and-obvious defense response
Defending a Claim

Defense Representation

  • Visitor status defense and duty-of-care challenges
  • Notice and constructive knowledge defense under FS 768.0755
  • Open-and-obvious doctrine and comparative fault arguments
  • Damages challenges and pre-existing condition analysis
  • Discovery, IME coordination, and defense preparation work
  • Settlement evaluation and offer of judgment strategy
Common Premises Cases

Types of Premises Claims

Premises liability covers a wide range of injury patterns. The legal framework varies depending on the property type, the visitor status, and the nature of the dangerous condition.

Case Type
Property Type
Key Issues
Slip-and-FallTransitory Substance
Commercial / Retail
FS 768.0755 notice proof, surveillance video, inspection logs, time interval between hazard creation and fall.
Trip-and-FallPermanent Hazard
Commercial / Residential
Uneven walkways, broken tile, defective stairs, missing handrails, building code violations, ADA compliance issues.
Negligent SecurityThird-Party Crime
Apartments / Hotels / Bars
Foreseeability of crime, prior incident history, security measures in place, lighting, locks, security personnel adequacy.
Swimming Pool CasesDrowning / Injury
Apartments / Hotels / Residential
Florida pool safety statutes, gate and fence requirements, lifeguard duty, lighting, slip surfaces, attractive nuisance for children.
Apartment / Condo CasesLandlord Liability
Residential
Florida landlord duties under Ch. 83, common-area maintenance, condo association responsibility, defective conditions in units.
Dog BiteStrict Liability
Any property
Florida dog bite statute Fla. Stat. § 767.04 imposes strict liability on the dog owner. Comparative fault and provocation defenses apply.
Construction / WorksiteOSHA & Code
Construction sites
Worker injury cases involving subcontractors, general contractors, property owners. OSHA and building code violations. Workers' comp interplay.
Government PremisesSovereign Immunity
Public buildings / Schools
Claims against government entities under Fla. Stat. § 768.28. Sovereign immunity caps. 3-year pre-suit notice requirement.

Summary of common Florida premises liability case types. Each case turns on the specific facts, the visitor classification, the property owner's notice of the dangerous condition, the comparative negligence analysis, and the available coverage.

Case Approach

How a Premises Case Gets Built

Premises liability cases require careful evidence preservation, strong notice proof, and disciplined damages development. Property owners and their insurers contest these cases hard, and the cases that produce strong recoveries are the ones where each element was developed thoroughly.

Scene Investigation and Evidence Preservation

The dangerous condition can be repaired, cleaned, or eliminated within hours. Photographs of the scene, the condition itself, and the surrounding area are critical. Surveillance video at commercial properties is typically overwritten on a 30 to 90 day cycle. A spoliation letter to the property owner demanding preservation of video, incident reports, and maintenance records should issue immediately. Cases where the scene was documented quickly negotiate from a position of strength.

In a slip-and-fall case, the surveillance video that proves the case is usually scheduled for automatic deletion before the bruises fade.

Notice and the FS 768.0755 Problem

Florida's slip-and-fall statute is the single biggest legal hurdle in transitory-substance cases. The injured person must prove the business had actual knowledge of the substance or constructive knowledge based on time the substance was on the floor or recurring nature of the condition. Florida courts have made this proof demanding. Surveillance video showing the time interval between when the substance appeared and when the fall occurred is often the deciding evidence.

Visitor Status and Duty Owed

Florida law distinguishes business invitees, licensees, and trespassers. Most claims involve invitees, who are owed the duty to keep the premises reasonably safe and to warn of known dangers. Licensees (social guests) are owed a lesser duty. Trespassers are owed only a duty not to willfully injure. Establishing the correct visitor status at the start of the case shapes everything that follows.

Negligent Security and Foreseeability

When the injury results from a third-party criminal act on the premises, the case turns on foreseeability. Prior similar incidents, the surrounding crime rate, the property owner's awareness, and the adequacy of security measures all become evidence. Negligent security cases are damages-heavy because the injuries are typically violent crimes (assault, sexual assault, robbery, shooting). Discovery of prior incident reports is often the decisive step.

Damages and Litigation Readiness

Premises cases settle when the carrier sees clear notice proof, well-documented damages, and a willingness to try the case. Filing suit, completing discovery, taking the property manager and corporate representative depositions, and pushing toward trial often produces the resolution. The settlement that compensates the injured visitor typically comes when the carrier sees the case is being prepared seriously.

Related Practice Areas

Related Personal Injury Matters

Premises liability cases frequently overlap with other personal injury areas. Each related practice carries a distinct framework.

Serious Injury Cases

Catastrophic injuries with permanent impairment, future medical care, and life-care planning. Common in negligent security and major fall cases.

Learn More →

Wrongful Death

Florida Wrongful Death Act claims under Chapter 768 for families pursuing claims after fatal injuries on unsafe premises.

Learn More →

Insurance Disputes

Coverage denials, undervaluation, and bad faith claims when premises liability carriers refuse to pay fair claim value.

Learn More →

Personal Injury

For accident cases that span multiple categories or where the case posture requires broader personal injury strategy.

Learn More →
Locations We Serve

Premises Liability Representation Across Miami-Dade

Property types and legal frameworks vary by city. See detailed information for the areas below.

Speak With Andre

Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000

Premises cases turn on early scene preservation, surveillance video, and notice proof. Cases that resolve well are the ones where counsel was engaged early, the evidence was preserved before it could be cleaned or overwritten, and the visitor-status and notice analysis was developed properly. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter usually creates more options than calling late.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say

Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm.

THE FRANZEN FIRM profile picture
THE FRANZEN FIRM
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is a high integrity and highly effective litigator who practices law with the professionalism and civility that all lawyers should aspire to do so.
Larry Kantor profile picture
Larry Kantor
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere has represented me from a legal perspective over the years from traffic tickets, to automobile accidents, which I must say I have gotten some very strong settlements for injuries. Mr. Rouviere has always been attentive to responding to my calls and texts in a timely manner which is very important to me. He also is batting a 100% on traffic tickets I have gotten they represented me on. I would highly recommend Mr. Rouviere for any and all legal issues that u might have. If an issue is not in his wheel house then he would direct you to another attorney who specializes in that field.
Kim Lazar profile picture
Kim Lazar
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Rouviere’s law firm provides honest, trustworthy legal representation backed by knowledge and expertise. When you need help with traffic tickets or any legal matters, you can rely on his experience and commitment to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.
Vladimir Fernandez profile picture
Vladimir Fernandez
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This is the lawyer and law firm by far they really dig to tha end to help you I really recommend it
Maria Romero profile picture
Maria Romero
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Andre Rouviere is an exceptional legal professional with dedication to his clients . The attention is strong and his committed to achieve the best possible outcome making it possible to be trusted I highly respect him and recommend him . Thank you for always being helpful
Ron Morgan profile picture
Ron Morgan
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has been my attorney for over twenty years. He is always there for me. Always answers his phone. The best choice I have ever made for my attorney.
Angel Orozco profile picture
Angel Orozco
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had the privilege of having Andre Rouviere represent me on multiple occasions over the past 30 years, and I can confidently say that he is an exceptional attorney. His professionalism, knowledge, integrity, and dedication have consistently given me complete confidence in his representation. Over the years, Andre has always taken the time to understand my situation, explain my options clearly, and provide thoughtful and honest guidance. Knowing that I can turn to someone I trust, even after three decades, speaks volumes about the quality of his work and the relationship he builds with his clients. I highly recommend Andre Rouviere to anyone looking for an experienced, trustworthy, and dedicated attorney. Five stars without hesitation!
mrpmaniac profile picture
mrpmaniac
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Represented me for 30 years. Experienced knowlegable very professional personable and detailed oriented. Highly recommended
Morgan Clark profile picture
Morgan Clark
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was fortunate to have Andre Rouviere represent me after I was involved in a serious car accident. From the very beginning, he was there every step of the way, providing clear communication, guidance, and reassurance throughout the entire process. He always made me feel confident that we would achieve the best possible outcome, and he absolutely delivered. I would confidently recommend Mr. Rouviere to anyone in need of an outstanding attorney.