Miami Premises Liability Attorney
Slip-and-fall, unsafe property conditions, negligent maintenance, and negligent security cases under Florida invitee, licensee, and trespasser law across Miami-Dade and South Florida. Plaintiff and defense representation across South Florida.
Frequently Asked Questions
What qualifies as a premises liability case in Florida?+
What is Florida's slip-and-fall statute and why is it strict?+
What is the difference between an invitee, licensee, and trespasser?+
What is the open and obvious doctrine?+
What is a negligent security case?+
How long do I have to file a premises liability claim in Florida?+
What evidence should I gather after a premises injury?+
What if I was partially at fault for the injury?+
What does it cost to hire a premises liability attorney?+
Does the firm represent both plaintiffs and defendants?+
How Premises Cases Are Built
Florida premises liability turns on visitor classification, notice of the dangerous condition, and proof of causation. Property owners and their insurers contest these cases hard, generally relying on the open-and-obvious doctrine and comparative fault arguments. Each layer requires distinct development from day one.
Visitor Status & Duty Owed
Florida law distinguishes between business invitees, licensees, and trespassers. The duty of care varies significantly. Most cases involve invitees, who are owed the highest duty.
Notice & Knowledge
Most cases turn on what the property owner knew or should have known. Slip-and-fall cases under Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 require proof of actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition.
Causation & Damages
The dangerous condition must have caused the injury. Pre-existing conditions, alternative explanations, and comparative fault all become defense theories addressed through medical and scene proof.
The Statutes That Define These Cases
Premises liability cases in Florida operate under several statutory frameworks. Each affects strategy and recovery in a different way. Visitor classification, notice proof, and the SOL all matter from day one.
Negligence SOL
For injuries on or after March 24, 2023, the statute of limitations is 2 years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). HB 837 cut this from the prior 4-year period.
FS 768.0755
Florida slip-and-fall statute requires the injured person to prove the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the transitory substance that caused the fall.
HB 837 Modified Comparative
Florida is a modified comparative negligence state. A finding of more than 50% plaintiff fault bars recovery entirely. Fault below 50% reduces the recovery proportionally.
Both Sides of Premises Litigation
The firm represents both injured visitors pursuing claims and property owners, businesses, or insurers defending claims. The strategy is different on each side, but the underlying preparation and discipline is the same.
Plaintiff Representation
- Visitor status analysis and duty-owed determination
- Notice proof under Fla. Stat. § 768.0755 for slip-and-fall
- Surveillance video preservation and maintenance record discovery
- Negligent security analysis when third-party crime is involved
- Damages development including future medical and life-care planning
- Comparative fault rebuttal and open-and-obvious defense response
Defense Representation
- Visitor status defense and duty-of-care challenges
- Notice and constructive knowledge defense under FS 768.0755
- Open-and-obvious doctrine and comparative fault arguments
- Damages challenges and pre-existing condition analysis
- Discovery, IME coordination, and defense preparation work
- Settlement evaluation and offer of judgment strategy
Types of Premises Claims
Premises liability covers a wide range of injury patterns. The legal framework varies depending on the property type, the visitor status, and the nature of the dangerous condition.
Summary of common Florida premises liability case types. Each case turns on the particular facts, the visitor classification, the property owner's notice of the dangerous condition, the comparative negligence analysis, and the available coverage.
How a Premises Case Gets Built
Premises liability cases require careful evidence preservation, strong notice proof, and disciplined damages development. Property owners and their insurers contest these cases hard, and the cases that produce strong recoveries are the ones where each element was developed thoroughly.
Scene Investigation and Evidence Preservation
The dangerous condition can be repaired, cleaned, or eliminated within hours. Photographs of the scene, the condition itself, and the surrounding area are critical. Surveillance video at commercial properties is generally overwritten on a 30 to 90 day cycle. A spoliation letter to the property owner demanding preservation of video, incident reports, and maintenance records should issue immediately. Cases where the scene was documented quickly negotiate from a position of strength.
In a slip-and-fall case, the surveillance video that proves the case is generally scheduled for automatic deletion before the bruises fade.
Notice and the FS 768.0755 Problem
Florida's slip-and-fall statute is the single biggest legal hurdle in transitory-substance cases. The injured person must prove the business had actual knowledge of the substance or constructive knowledge based on time the substance was on the floor or recurring nature of the condition. Florida courts have made this proof demanding. Surveillance video showing the time interval between when the substance appeared and when the fall occurred is commonly the deciding evidence.
Visitor Status and Duty Owed
Florida law distinguishes business invitees, licensees, and trespassers. Most claims involve invitees, who are owed the duty to keep the premises reasonably safe and to warn of known dangers. Licensees (social guests) are owed a lesser duty. Trespassers are owed just a duty not to willfully injure. Establishing the correct visitor status at the start of the case shapes everything that follows.
Negligent Security and Foreseeability
When the injury results from a third-party criminal act on the premises, the case turns on foreseeability. Prior similar incidents, the surrounding crime rate, the property owner's awareness, and the adequacy of security measures all become evidence. Negligent security cases are damages-heavy because the injuries are commonly violent crimes (assault, sexual assault, robbery, shooting). Discovery of prior incident reports is commonly the decisive step.
Damages and Litigation Readiness
Premises cases settle when the carrier sees clear notice proof, well-documented damages, and a willingness to try the case. Filing suit, completing discovery, taking the property manager and corporate representative depositions, and pushing toward trial in many cases produces the resolution. The settlement that compensates the injured visitor generally comes when the carrier sees the case is being prepared seriously.
Related Personal Injury Matters
Premises liability cases commonly overlap with other personal injury areas. Each related practice carries a distinct framework.
Serious Injury Cases
Catastrophic injuries with permanent impairment, future medical care, and life-care planning. Common in negligent security and major fall cases.
Learn More →Wrongful Death
Florida Wrongful Death Act claims under Chapter 768 for families pursuing claims after fatal injuries on unsafe premises.
Learn More →Premises Liability Representation Across Miami-Dade
Property types and legal frameworks vary by city. See detailed information for the areas below.
Direct attorney access at (305) 774-7000
Premises cases turn on early scene preservation, surveillance video, and notice proof. Cases that resolve well are the ones where counsel was engaged early, the evidence was preserved before it could be cleaned or overwritten, and the visitor-status and notice analysis was developed properly. Initial consultations are free and confidential, with no obligation to retain. Calling early in a matter in most cases creates more options than calling late.
What Our Clients Say
Verified Google reviews from clients represented by the firm across Miami-Dade and South Florida. See our full client testimonials page for more.
Posted on Google![]()
Eddy's Dogs aka Eddy's K9 RescueTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Absolutely recommend this law firm. They handled my case and I was amazed at the attention and information I got. I highly recommend them and will be using their services again.Posted on Google![]()
Carlos ZaldivarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre is an exceptional lawyer. Andre represented me in a civil case and did an exceptional job when I was told not to bother with a suit. Andre succeeded, and I got my money back. I send all my friends to AndrePosted on Google![]()
Bob RTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Andre has represented me, my family and friends on several legal matters. He is always available to provide sound, practical advice and more than willing and able to fight for you when necessary. It’s reassuring to have a qualified, experienced lawyer in my corner to protect me and my interests when I need it.
Owner's reply
Bob, thank you. Clients who return and who send their family and friends give me the highest compliment. I’m grateful for your confidence and I’m always here if you need me.Posted on Google![]()
Phil GlatzerTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
As an attorney, I have often referred my clients to André for legal work that I myself cannot handle and everyone has always been very satisfied with his representation. I highly recommend him.
Owner's reply
Thanks Phil. A referral from a colleague who knows the work means a great deal to me. I take every case you send my way seriously, and I’m glad the clients were well served.Posted on Google![]()
Pedro CarreraTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can always count on him. An honest lawyer.
Owner's reply
Thanks Pedro.Posted on Google![]()
Gabriel HernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Extremely quick and efficient . My ticket was handed and I didn’t have to worry about it once. His staff is also super helpful giving multiple updates on the status
Owner's reply
It's great to hear you were pleased. We are happy we were able to take the burden off your shoulders and resolve your issue for you.Posted on Google![]()
Andrew VarelaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
An amazing attorney who gives every case the care and attention it deserves. His attention to detail is exceptional, and it’s clear that he takes pride in his work and truly cares about his clients. I highly recommend him to anyone looking for a dedicated, thorough, and attentive attorney!
Owner's reply
I really appreciate that Andrew. Thank you.Posted on Google![]()
Daniel HernandezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend this law firm! I had a ticket, and they kept me updated and got it dismissed. Kaylee was my go-to for communication, and Andre is excellent at what he does.
Owner's reply
Thanks Daniel. I am glad we were able to resolve your issue.
